Comments on: Party at the Blogger Bash http://amamasblog.com/2008/08/29/party-at-the-blogger-bash/ Daily life with my two boys and other topics Fri, 03 Sep 2010 04:24:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: tall maternity jeans http://amamasblog.com/2008/08/29/party-at-the-blogger-bash/comment-page-1/#comment-2473 tall maternity jeans Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:24:04 +0000 http://amamasblog.com/?p=664#comment-2473 hi,its look like a fantastic party. cheers, <a href="http://tall-maternity-jeans.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">tall maternity jeans</a> hi,its look like a fantastic party.
cheers,
tall maternity jeans

]]> By: RMBB 5000 Round-up http://amamasblog.com/2008/08/29/party-at-the-blogger-bash/comment-page-1/#comment-1999 RMBB 5000 Round-up Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:25:05 +0000 http://amamasblog.com/?p=664#comment-1999 [...] You can read other recaps of the event here, here, here, and here. [...] [...] You can read other recaps of the event here, here, here, and here. [...]

]]> By: Chez Artz » Blog Archive » The Three Minute Update! http://amamasblog.com/2008/08/29/party-at-the-blogger-bash/comment-page-1/#comment-1975 Chez Artz » Blog Archive » The Three Minute Update! Tue, 02 Sep 2008 04:27:49 +0000 http://amamasblog.com/?p=664#comment-1975 [...] ladies have already covered this (Crazy Bloggin’ Canuck, Crunchy Domestic Goddess, and A Mama’s Blog all have good coverage ), so I won’t say more except that I really wish the lovely gentleman [...] [...] ladies have already covered this (Crazy Bloggin’ Canuck, Crunchy Domestic Goddess, and A Mama’s Blog all have good coverage ), so I won’t say more except that I really wish the lovely gentleman [...]

]]> By: Julie http://amamasblog.com/2008/08/29/party-at-the-blogger-bash/comment-page-1/#comment-1974 Julie Tue, 02 Sep 2008 04:20:03 +0000 http://amamasblog.com/?p=664#comment-1974 So you put a picture of yourself up and you fessed up that Denver is "the big city" you reference :) I had a great time Thursday even if we did stay up too late! Glad you joined us!!! So you put a picture of yourself up and you fessed up that Denver is “the big city” you reference :)

I had a great time Thursday even if we did stay up too late! Glad you joined us!!!

]]> By: barney http://amamasblog.com/2008/08/29/party-at-the-blogger-bash/comment-page-1/#comment-1959 barney Mon, 01 Sep 2008 03:15:37 +0000 http://amamasblog.com/?p=664#comment-1959 Our Blogs, like our kids, need to be protected as they grow. P.U.B. [Publishers Union of Bloggers] has pending inquires to Widget Providers concerning how they generate their income and what percentage of this income goes to the Blog Publisher making the critical decision to allow a Widget on their site for their readers. In addition we are requesting transparency on the critical issue of how the private statistic from Publishers Blogs are being used, hopefully with the Publisher’s permission! Before you just post and point publishers to these widget options, consider the content we create as bloggers valuable. For example, who is representing us for the VALUE of this data the Lijit widget is both searching and claiming rights too in its terms of use page. Who owns it? What about each individual blogger’s data and the critical sanctity of Publishers private statistics. We at P.U.B. consider the safety of the information any app or widget(s) may be gathering, unbeknownst to the unwitting Publisher who installs them. P.U.B. [Publishers Union of Bloggers] has made direct inquires to both Lijit Senior executives and the venture capitalists investing in Lijit concerning: Ownership of content/ how Lijit generates income and what percentage of this income goes to the Blog Publisher making the critical decision to allow a Widget on their site for their readers. In addition we have requested transparency on the critical issue of how the private statistic from Publishers Blogs are being used. P.U.B. expected to hear back from Lijit on these financial and private statistics issues from P.U.B’s first inquiry we sent to Lijit in mid April 2008. So far all we’ve read is a public blog response(s) from Lijit advising 1) Lijit has no money, then 2) emails from Lijit’s CEO, Todd Vernon, attacking P.U.B. and falsely accusing we are writing fictitious emails. Any actual answer to PUB’s questions about the use of Publisher’s stats, or revenue as it applies to Lijit? Nada. Nothing. P.U.B.’s job is to fight for Publishers asking hard questions and demanding answers. If all Widget companies respond as Lijit’s done up to this point, P.U.B. has a big workload for our Publishers, and your membership and support helps us all as Publishers, thanks. If P.U.B. or our Blog Publisher membership ever gets a straight answer on topic from Lijit, not smoke and mirrors, we will let great Blog Publishers like you know their exact revenue/statistics use/sharing deal. Currently we are also working with Blog Publishers to track performance hit evaluations of Lijit installations, and of course the critical issue of actual ownership of content pulled by Lijit from our blogs. Will publish these results to keep the community of Blog Publishers informed on this critical component of Widgets on our Blogs. Sincerely, Barney Moran Founder, P.U.B. Facilitator, Daddy Boot Camp, Boulder, CO Our Blogs, like our kids, need to be protected as they grow. P.U.B. [Publishers Union of Bloggers] has pending inquires to Widget Providers concerning how they generate their income and what percentage of this income goes to the Blog Publisher making the critical decision to allow a Widget on their site for their readers. In addition we are requesting transparency on the critical issue of how the private statistic from Publishers Blogs are being used, hopefully with the Publisher’s permission!
Before you just post and point publishers to these widget options, consider the content we create as bloggers valuable. For example, who is representing us for the VALUE of this data the Lijit widget is both searching and claiming rights too in its terms of use page. Who owns it? What about each individual blogger’s data and the critical sanctity of Publishers private statistics. We at P.U.B. consider the safety of the information any app or widget(s) may be gathering, unbeknownst to the unwitting Publisher who installs them.
P.U.B. [Publishers Union of Bloggers] has made direct inquires to both Lijit Senior executives and the venture capitalists investing in Lijit concerning: Ownership of content/ how Lijit generates income and what percentage of this income goes to the Blog Publisher making the critical decision to allow a Widget on their site for their readers. In addition we have requested transparency on the critical issue of how the private statistic from Publishers Blogs are being used.
P.U.B. expected to hear back from Lijit on these financial and private statistics issues from P.U.B’s first inquiry we sent to Lijit in mid April 2008. So far all we’ve read is a public blog response(s) from Lijit advising 1) Lijit has no money, then 2) emails from Lijit’s CEO, Todd Vernon, attacking P.U.B. and falsely accusing we are writing fictitious emails. Any actual answer to PUB’s questions about the use of Publisher’s stats, or revenue as it applies to Lijit? Nada. Nothing.
P.U.B.’s job is to fight for Publishers asking hard questions and demanding answers. If all Widget companies respond as Lijit’s done up to this point, P.U.B. has a big workload for our Publishers, and your membership and support helps us all as Publishers, thanks.
If P.U.B. or our Blog Publisher membership ever gets a straight answer on topic from Lijit, not smoke and mirrors, we will let great Blog Publishers like you know their exact revenue/statistics use/sharing deal. Currently we are also working with Blog Publishers to track performance hit evaluations of Lijit installations, and of course the critical issue of actual ownership of content pulled by Lijit from our blogs.
Will publish these results to keep the community of Blog Publishers informed on this critical component of Widgets on our Blogs.
Sincerely,
Barney Moran
Founder, P.U.B.
Facilitator, Daddy Boot Camp, Boulder, CO

]]>