<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: C-sections Five Years and Beyond (Part 2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amamasblog.com/2009/04/27/c-sections-five-years-and-beyond-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amamasblog.com/2009/04/27/c-sections-five-years-and-beyond-part-2/</link>
	<description>Daily life with my two boys and other topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:49:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maddie </title>
		<link>http://amamasblog.com/2009/04/27/c-sections-five-years-and-beyond-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3590</link>
		<dc:creator>Maddie </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amamasblog.com/?p=1504#comment-3590</guid>
		<description>As a mother who&#039;s child died but might have been saved by having a c-section ( it saved his brother) I have no regerts about having one. We tend to idealize birth in the &quot;olden days&quot; but I don&#039;t think people realize how many babies and mothers died in chidbirth back then. It was just a given that a certain number of babies did not make it and if you serach even a generation or two back in your family tree you can see that most mothers lost at least one child.   I have no desire to raise the number of c-sections being done but it&#039;s foolish to think of it as a sub par wayto birth when in the end it&#039;s the child not the eperience that we are going for.

Maddie 
www.domesticanarchy.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a mother who&#8217;s child died but might have been saved by having a c-section ( it saved his brother) I have no regerts about having one. We tend to idealize birth in the &#8220;olden days&#8221; but I don&#8217;t think people realize how many babies and mothers died in chidbirth back then. It was just a given that a certain number of babies did not make it and if you serach even a generation or two back in your family tree you can see that most mothers lost at least one child.   I have no desire to raise the number of c-sections being done but it&#8217;s foolish to think of it as a sub par wayto birth when in the end it&#8217;s the child not the eperience that we are going for.</p>
<p>Maddie<br />
<a href="http://www.domesticanarchy.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.domesticanarchy.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C-sections Five Years and Beyond (Part 2) &#124; Health @ U Want 2 Know .Info </title>
		<link>http://amamasblog.com/2009/04/27/c-sections-five-years-and-beyond-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3586</link>
		<dc:creator>C-sections Five Years and Beyond (Part 2) &#124; Health @ U Want 2 Know .Info </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amamasblog.com/?p=1504#comment-3586</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by A Mama&#8217;s Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by A Mama&#8217;s Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

