<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Jackson- Victim or Victimizer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amamasblog.com/2009/06/25/michael-jackson-victim-or-victimizer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amamasblog.com/2009/06/25/michael-jackson-victim-or-victimizer/</link>
	<description>Daily life with my two boys and other topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 04:24:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Mama's Blog</title>
		<link>http://amamasblog.com/2009/06/25/michael-jackson-victim-or-victimizer/comment-page-3/#comment-4535</link>
		<dc:creator>A Mama's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 05:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amamasblog.com/?p=1623#comment-4535</guid>
		<description>Shock,

I actually found the Smoking Gun story referenced from the Guardian in the UK http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/dec/19/usa.michaeljacksontrial, and on Wikipedia  (under Grand Jury Proceedings and indictments) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_v._Jackson

The reason why the Smoking Gun is cited and used as a reference in the case against MJ, is because they published the secret transcript of the court proceedings.   If you feel the avenue of where the transcript was published, discounts the merit of what the transcript contains, and use that to criticize my research that is your prerogative.  I used The Smoking Gun as a source that published transcripts of the court procedure that was not published elsewhere, so that the information was there, for others to form their own opinions with facts.
   
Thanks to all the comments, many readers have provided further documents, research, and information.  There is no shortage of information on this case. The Smoking Gun however, in my opinion, provided a key to the case when they published the secret transcripts that had not been published elsewhere. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shock,</p>
<p>I actually found the Smoking Gun story referenced from the Guardian in the UK <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/dec/19/usa.michaeljacksontrial" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/dec/19/usa.michaeljacksontrial</a>, and on Wikipedia  (under Grand Jury Proceedings and indictments) <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_v._Jackson" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_v._Jackson</a></p>
<p>The reason why the Smoking Gun is cited and used as a reference in the case against MJ, is because they published the secret transcript of the court proceedings.   If you feel the avenue of where the transcript was published, discounts the merit of what the transcript contains, and use that to criticize my research that is your prerogative.  I used The Smoking Gun as a source that published transcripts of the court procedure that was not published elsewhere, so that the information was there, for others to form their own opinions with facts.</p>
<p>Thanks to all the comments, many readers have provided further documents, research, and information.  There is no shortage of information on this case. The Smoking Gun however, in my opinion, provided a key to the case when they published the secret transcripts that had not been published elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shock</title>
		<link>http://amamasblog.com/2009/06/25/michael-jackson-victim-or-victimizer/comment-page-3/#comment-4534</link>
		<dc:creator>shock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amamasblog.com/?p=1623#comment-4534</guid>
		<description>You used the Smoking Gun as your research???? What a amateur writer you are. There is more to the case then what you write abou. Do better research and come back with better evidence and not just your opinion. Geez! I will agree to one thing you wrote, he should have know better since he was the adult. That does not, however make him a pedophile. Michael is not OJ Simpson get real, please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You used the Smoking Gun as your research???? What a amateur writer you are. There is more to the case then what you write abou. Do better research and come back with better evidence and not just your opinion. Geez! I will agree to one thing you wrote, he should have know better since he was the adult. That does not, however make him a pedophile. Michael is not OJ Simpson get real, please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carole</title>
		<link>http://amamasblog.com/2009/06/25/michael-jackson-victim-or-victimizer/comment-page-3/#comment-4465</link>
		<dc:creator>Carole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 04:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amamasblog.com/?p=1623#comment-4465</guid>
		<description>Michael was found innocent and the jury does get it right.
He was guilty of being a bad judge of people and hooking up with people with doubtful characters.  There are a lot of headcases out there and it only takes a couple to ruin your life.
Michael was a kind person and could not see bad in people until it was too late.
RIP MJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael was found innocent and the jury does get it right.<br />
He was guilty of being a bad judge of people and hooking up with people with doubtful characters.  There are a lot of headcases out there and it only takes a couple to ruin your life.<br />
Michael was a kind person and could not see bad in people until it was too late.<br />
RIP MJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://amamasblog.com/2009/06/25/michael-jackson-victim-or-victimizer/comment-page-3/#comment-4444</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 16:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amamasblog.com/?p=1623#comment-4444</guid>
		<description>MJ is INNOCENT~~~~~ before I go any further I am victim of a serious sexual assault as a child and a mother of 4.

MJ would NEVER have harmed a child and thanks to people who think like you and the media and the blood money leeches Michael was destroyed !!!!!!!!!!!!! then murdered.

I hope all you nay sayers get yours I know michael is in a better place now, he sure wasn&#039;t here on earth, it is the nay sayers that helped kill him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MJ is INNOCENT~~~~~ before I go any further I am victim of a serious sexual assault as a child and a mother of 4.</p>
<p>MJ would NEVER have harmed a child and thanks to people who think like you and the media and the blood money leeches Michael was destroyed !!!!!!!!!!!!! then murdered.</p>
<p>I hope all you nay sayers get yours I know michael is in a better place now, he sure wasn&#8217;t here on earth, it is the nay sayers that helped kill him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lovely</title>
		<link>http://amamasblog.com/2009/06/25/michael-jackson-victim-or-victimizer/comment-page-3/#comment-4239</link>
		<dc:creator>Lovely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amamasblog.com/?p=1623#comment-4239</guid>
		<description>Sometimes the jury doesn&#039;t get it right.  Rest in peace Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman.  Rot in jail Oj, and deal with the deeds done in your life MJ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes the jury doesn&#8217;t get it right.  Rest in peace Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman.  Rot in jail Oj, and deal with the deeds done in your life MJ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
